Mastodon
@Portland Trail Blazers

I know we’re probably not going to be spending much this off-season cash wise on anyone other than Grant but thought this was relevant given our continued need of a solid 3.



I know we’re probably not going to be spending much this off-season cash wise on anyone other than Grant but thought this was relevant given our continued need of a solid 3.

by BunkHammer

6 Comments

  1. I would happily take him.

    Dude sucks offensively, but he can still do more than guys like Winslow can on offense, and he’s genuinely a great defender

    We don’t need the offense. He’d be nice in a lower volume role on a vet min trying to prove he has value

  2. Rawesome16

    Not Dillon brooks. Skill issues for that attitude.

    Even duck fans don’t claim him anymore. Or at least, the ones I’ve spoken to

  3. BunkHammer

    For clarification: I’m not saying we should or shouldn’t sign Brooks. I just wanted to show what is available if we don’t end up trading for a starting 3 this offseason.

  4. Aggressive-Crazy4633

    The fact that Brooks went to Oregon and his value has never been lower is extremely intriguing.

Write A Comment