Mastodon
Search for:
@Philadelphia 76ers

Joel4MVP on Twitter: “The idea is supposed to be to add players that make the team better, not worse, especially if you are going to have them playing so many minutes with the best player. Tucker and Melton were not good acquisitions”



So looking at the NET Ratings, the Sixers are much better without Melton & PJ regardless of if Embiid is also on the floor or not. So why do Sixers fans love those two and dislike guys like Shake & Matisse who actually made Embiid & the Sixers better statistically?

by FantasticFruits2023

2 Comments

  1. ValiantFrog2202

    Think you see it when they had Maxey on bench and Melton starting. Embiid just makes everyone better

  2. MrThreebound

    Tucker is what Tucker is, but Melton is a good player.

    Just because he isn’t better than Maxey doesn’t mean he’s bad.

Write A Comment