I could see a trade midseason to move on from someone like Kelly, but right now while we don’t know what we got in Hendricks and mean to develop him I think it’s best to go into the season with all these forwards
There’s enough minutes for everyone, at least while Hendricks is learning the ropes.
pooker55
All of these would be horrible, creates a log jam in the back court, and don’t make sense.
Silent-Frame1452
We don’t have a logjam when you consider it’s 3 positions and Hendricks will want time to develop.
I could see us moving someone at the deadline but it’d be in a better deal than any of these. None of them make a great deal of sense.
Croatianspank
Let them cook for now, the market is dry and we aren’t in a rush. Wait for someone to get desperate and make the trade.
hagridandbuckbeak
Get Kelly off the roster, no offense to him but he is clearly the guy that doesn’t fit the timeline
mrcolty5
The first deal I definitely like the most, gives us a point guard (not a great one) but another frp to use too
tenisplenty
There is no logjam it’s just good depth, you want a solid two deep at every position. Markannen, Collins, Kessler are the starters with Olynyk, Hendricks, and maybe Semanic off the bench.
chikintendeez
Nah our frontcourt is solid. People always forgetting injuries are inevitable so we will want the depth we have.
RandomStranger79
That Dame trade is asinine. The others should be called 4 trades to get rid of one of Utah’s only playmakers.
scrawlx101
thoughts n getting bol bol?
chargon
There is no logjam
TheCapChas
The idea with this article is to move on from some bigmen by trading for….a different bigman?
12 Comments
I could see a trade midseason to move on from someone like Kelly, but right now while we don’t know what we got in Hendricks and mean to develop him I think it’s best to go into the season with all these forwards
There’s enough minutes for everyone, at least while Hendricks is learning the ropes.
All of these would be horrible, creates a log jam in the back court, and don’t make sense.
We don’t have a logjam when you consider it’s 3 positions and Hendricks will want time to develop.
I could see us moving someone at the deadline but it’d be in a better deal than any of these. None of them make a great deal of sense.
Let them cook for now, the market is dry and we aren’t in a rush. Wait for someone to get desperate and make the trade.
Get Kelly off the roster, no offense to him but he is clearly the guy that doesn’t fit the timeline
The first deal I definitely like the most, gives us a point guard (not a great one) but another frp to use too
There is no logjam it’s just good depth, you want a solid two deep at every position. Markannen, Collins, Kessler are the starters with Olynyk, Hendricks, and maybe Semanic off the bench.
Nah our frontcourt is solid. People always forgetting injuries are inevitable so we will want the depth we have.
That Dame trade is asinine. The others should be called 4 trades to get rid of one of Utah’s only playmakers.
thoughts n getting bol bol?
There is no logjam
The idea with this article is to move on from some bigmen by trading for….a different bigman?