Obvious Spurs bias aside (yes, yes, we didnt stand a chance), is there any real merit to this tournament? Say the spurs (or any team) win this, but then miss the playoffs or lose in the first round, would we really care about winning this?
The play-in tournament was well received because it actually had an impact on playoff contention, but this feels like someone trying to hype up something with no real value.
Eh maybe it’s still too early to tell, but hey, at least they tried something to make the early season more interesting.
by hecmar018
7 Comments
Give it the rest of the tournament and see how it goes. Everything else is premature analysis.
Yes and dangerous to players with those courts
My question is; “why not?”
The courts are ugly, but the tournament doesn’t hurt anything and gives us something to talk about in December, so it’s really not a big deal.
Just another pointless gimmick by Silver.
Silver is a terrible Commissioner. For a thousand reasons. But this is not a bad idea. Logically it takes years to guarantee a minimum of “history” for this competition.
Y’all just wanna complain about everything. No one cares about the nba until after the Super Bowl (not me, I watch all 82 spurs games) so I think this is awesome to get more attention on the league.
I like it, and I think the true colors of people show when they are complaining before the elimination rounds even begin. Teams are already playing harder during the group stage. Single elimination games are going to change some minds. Maybe some adjustments will have to be made next year but at least they’re trying something to give us good competitive baskeball before the playoffs.