Love it! Although our starters with Wiggins and Klay had to be one of the worst.
Which means MDJ should make a trade to better balance out the team especially in the playoffs when teams shorten their rotation and play their stars.
We need a #2 option in the worst way.
Realnonamer1
If only our starters were like last year, we’d be a top seed.
TallnFrosty
How is this measured? Which lineups are considered bench lineups vs non bench?
Nessmuk58
Interesting to note that our bench has also had more MPG by almost a full minute than the second-highest team. 5 MPG more than a few. That means starter REST!
Banned3rdTimesaCharm
It’s like the Raiders finally having a top rank defense and zero offense. Just can’t get things to line up. I have hope that our starts will regress to the mean though.
RawrGeeBe
What happens when you have backups starting over the real starters. Looney is a bench player, and Draymond and Wiggins needs to go. Klay been on a little hot streak since the changes, but he’s still sus on whether it’s just a Poole-ish hot streak.
lihtness
We also have second to last starters. It balances out so far. Hopefully Celtics game is the beginning of the change.
LaughingPlanet
The way I see it, our depth is a massive strength. We can use our aging core as “closers”, as with baseball.
Instead of them having to play heavy minutes, we ride the young guys as much as possible.
I still believe the Rockets shrinking their rotation to 8 in the playoffs is why they went 0-27 in game 7. Tired legs is a bad thing for Bball
nghbrhd_slackr87
Really as many nail biters as we’ve played… we’re literally 6 possessions from being 17-10.
Sacramento actually has been worse in my opinion than us. They get blown out every third game. But they caught more breaks and haven’t played 23 consecutive clutchtime games which may be a record.
Man those Wiggs/Klay cold spells really caught us on the chin.
10 Comments
Love it! Although our starters with Wiggins and Klay had to be one of the worst.
Which means MDJ should make a trade to better balance out the team especially in the playoffs when teams shorten their rotation and play their stars.
We need a #2 option in the worst way.
If only our starters were like last year, we’d be a top seed.
How is this measured? Which lineups are considered bench lineups vs non bench?
Interesting to note that our bench has also had more MPG by almost a full minute than the second-highest team. 5 MPG more than a few. That means starter REST!
It’s like the Raiders finally having a top rank defense and zero offense. Just can’t get things to line up. I have hope that our starts will regress to the mean though.
What happens when you have backups starting over the real starters. Looney is a bench player, and Draymond and Wiggins needs to go. Klay been on a little hot streak since the changes, but he’s still sus on whether it’s just a Poole-ish hot streak.
We also have second to last starters. It balances out so far. Hopefully Celtics game is the beginning of the change.
The way I see it, our depth is a massive strength. We can use our aging core as “closers”, as with baseball.
Instead of them having to play heavy minutes, we ride the young guys as much as possible.
I still believe the Rockets shrinking their rotation to 8 in the playoffs is why they went 0-27 in game 7. Tired legs is a bad thing for Bball
Really as many nail biters as we’ve played… we’re literally 6 possessions from being 17-10.
Sacramento actually has been worse in my opinion than us. They get blown out every third game. But they caught more breaks and haven’t played 23 consecutive clutchtime games which may be a record.
Man those Wiggs/Klay cold spells really caught us on the chin.
Imagine having the starters showing up 😍