No. Siakam nuked his value. No way the Pacers give up any young guys for a rental. Walker, Mathurin, Nembhard, and Nesmith are probably all off the table.
New_Essay_4869
No
Petit_Coeur_
No
cWamp
The sticking point with Siakam is he’s an unrestricted FA in 6 months and the Sixers will have max cap space, a reigning MVP, and Siakam’s former championship coach on board.
Shelling out $170m/4yrs to keep a 30 year old veteran is a tough enough pill to swallow, but the fact is he may still walk even if that’s offered to re-sign him.
TheNamelessOne913
I can’t wait for the trade deadline to pass so we don’t have to hear about Siakam anymore
house_fire
i’d consider if it came with a Pascal extension, but even then I think it’s still a no
One_Ratio9521
Laughable
Bacorn31
Didn’t even look at the trade and the answer is NO
Indy-sports
Negative.
Maximum-Class5465
Absolutely not
pacerjones20
No
fuzzynavel34
Nope. I would not. Not giving up two firsts for a guy that’s gonna walk in 4 months
biffkadiddle
No
wpmason
No Siakam.
PBB22
Don’t need to look at the trade, no.
gucci55
i wouldn’t trade for an UFA at all. idk why they would trade for him at all due to that
Relevant_Glass6153
Lmfao
Glass_Mango_229
I wouldn’t but that’s a fair trade.
GhostRevival
No, I’m not even gonna look at it and the answer is no. It makes zero sense for the Pacers to trade anything of value for him if he’s not gonna sign a deal here.
Edit: Decided to actually look and the answer is HELL no. Basically 3 1sts for a guy that’s 30 and wants over 35+ a season? Idiotic.
20 Comments
I’ll pass, even on a good day
No. Siakam nuked his value. No way the Pacers give up any young guys for a rental. Walker, Mathurin, Nembhard, and Nesmith are probably all off the table.
No
No
The sticking point with Siakam is he’s an unrestricted FA in 6 months and the Sixers will have max cap space, a reigning MVP, and Siakam’s former championship coach on board.
Shelling out $170m/4yrs to keep a 30 year old veteran is a tough enough pill to swallow, but the fact is he may still walk even if that’s offered to re-sign him.
I can’t wait for the trade deadline to pass so we don’t have to hear about Siakam anymore
i’d consider if it came with a Pascal extension, but even then I think it’s still a no
Laughable
Didn’t even look at the trade and the answer is NO
Negative.
Absolutely not
No
Nope. I would not. Not giving up two firsts for a guy that’s gonna walk in 4 months
No
No Siakam.
Don’t need to look at the trade, no.
i wouldn’t trade for an UFA at all. idk why they would trade for him at all due to that
Lmfao
I wouldn’t but that’s a fair trade.
No, I’m not even gonna look at it and the answer is no. It makes zero sense for the Pacers to trade anything of value for him if he’s not gonna sign a deal here.
Edit: Decided to actually look and the answer is HELL no. Basically 3 1sts for a guy that’s 30 and wants over 35+ a season? Idiotic.