Mastodon
@Chicago Bulls

[Brian Windhorst] “If they could trade Zach LaVine in the next five minutes, they would trade him and Zach would happily go to the airport.”



[Brian Windhorst] “If they could trade Zach LaVine in the next five minutes, they would trade him and Zach would happily go to the airport.”

by Guilty_Bicycle_5711

22 Comments

  1. skeletor1996

    This is the first time this has felt like posturing for someone else rather then the truth tbh

  2. ToeJelly420

    So basically we really want to trade him, but nobody wants to give a fair return?

    Ima be pissed if we trade him for scraps. Tomorrow is the day where pretty much everyone can be traded, so we might get some dominoes falling soon. I have no interest in the lakers package, and limited interest in the warriors and kings packages.

    We should be trying to get picks, but i dont think our front office cares about picks given that they still want to compete post-Lavine.

  3. OneWithTheBuffoons

    You mean the Lebron dick sucker is trying to push a narrative? You don’t say.

  4. PROFsmOAK

    You gotta pay to play, so how bad do you want LaVine?

  5. Obi7kenobi

    ![gif](giphy|U1xERzPdSQA2leN6xp|downsized)

    Winhorst…

  6. StoicRetention

    I call BS, Zach’s play since his return is a completely different player from what he was when the rumours started. Price of the brick is going up

  7. Mr-Chip18

    I will keep saying this until he’s traded but if Zach’s market is good keep him and trade Demar for anything. Zach n Demar just don’t work and I’d rather have the younger more athletic shooting wing than Demar

  8. Seems to be abit of noise about Lavine to the Pistons. Kevin Anderson from NBCS retweeted that the move the pistons made is a precursor to another Bigger move for an existing player

    Odd from a Bulls man to get involved in that if he wasn’t hearing something

  9. BilboLaggin

    I would trade him for expiring contracts alone. What’s a more realistic pathway for winning? Keeping him on the rest of his deal or having cap space and flexibility to make different moves?

  10. If we could trade Winshorst in the next five minutesx we would and Windhorst would happily go to the airport.

  11. NotKeanuReevez

    can’t believe im saying this but what perk said on this segment should be heard, $40mil a year for a player that can give you 25/5/5 easily every night when max player contracts will soon be $70mil a year is almost a steal for the right team

    if he keeps playing like he has lately, I’d rather trade demar for what you can get as his contract winds down and keep the backcourt intact bc we’re not getting good offers for zach

  12. Good-Raccoon-6991

    If Brian Windhorst could begin a healthy lifestyle, it would last the next five minutes, and then Brian would happily go to Popeye’s.

  13. volantredx

    I mean what is the benefit to trading Zach unless AKME gets a fair return? He isn’t sitting out pouting until he gets a trade so it’s not just dead cap or anything. He’s playing hard and buying in, literally the one thing they wanted him to do. If he still wants to go to LA or whatever, fine, but there is zero pressure for AKME to actually move until someone else is desperate.

    It was different when he was visibly upset and the team was like 10 games under .500. There was actual pressure to do *something* to try and fix things. Now that it seems to have sorted things out there is zero pressure unless Zach himself is asking out and they want to do right by him. Since he isn’t sitting out and pulling a Harden there’s no reason to do anything until the trade deadline.

  14. hankbaumbach

    I am also in the camp that still wants to trade Lavine. He puts a hard limit on the ceiling of this team due to his contract that his play does not come very close to justifying.

    We are a better team going forward without him.

Write A Comment