It’s a good discussion, but they’re confusing multiple factors as one problem.
1. The “Rose Rule” which allowed players to agree on an extension, but still potentially qualify for a supermax after it was signed.
2. The initial decision to tie the supermax extension to all-nba honors
3. Curtailing load management as a response to their audience.
The 65 game rule is the tipping point, but there are decisions made over a decade ago that lead to Tyrese’s situation
djtjb2
Man the YouTube comments are brutal lol. Like I get it, but they are projecting both wage inequality and their hate for load management on a guy who legit got hurt and could miss out on a clause in his contract because of an unlucky slip. The villainization of Tyrese is a little extreme.
2 Comments
It’s a good discussion, but they’re confusing multiple factors as one problem.
1. The “Rose Rule” which allowed players to agree on an extension, but still potentially qualify for a supermax after it was signed.
2. The initial decision to tie the supermax extension to all-nba honors
3. Curtailing load management as a response to their audience.
The 65 game rule is the tipping point, but there are decisions made over a decade ago that lead to Tyrese’s situation
Man the YouTube comments are brutal lol. Like I get it, but they are projecting both wage inequality and their hate for load management on a guy who legit got hurt and could miss out on a clause in his contract because of an unlucky slip. The villainization of Tyrese is a little extreme.