Mastodon
@National Basketball Association

[Slater] Steve Kerr: “If you want to say (Steph Curry) playing 30 or 32 minutes was the difference in a win or a loss, I totally disagree.”



[Slater] Steve Kerr: “If you want to say (Steph Curry) playing 30 or 32 minutes was the difference in a win or a loss, I totally disagree.”

by Michael_B_Lopez

36 Comments

  1. Just-Efficiency3129

    Bro hates steph it’s actually wild

  2. KryptoNike21

    This fucker does not know how to take accountability

  3. Fit-Avocado-342

    How about you run a play for curry at the end of the game bro

  4. damn the guy is disagreeing with the entire warriors fanbase then

  5. KermitTheEdgelord

    Under 30 minutes for Curry was pretty unacceptable, but to be fair to Kerr, the real issue were just the completely wide open looks the Warriors gave the Wolves at the end of the third and beginning of the fourth quarter. Unless we consider steph to be their defensive anchor now lol

  6. People call us out for saying this dude shouldn’t be the coach b/c we won 4 championships (which I’m forever grateful for). The game simply moved on from Steve Kerr and extending him was the worst possible mistake the FO could make

  7. AShinyTorchic

    Playing your best player sub 30 minutes while possibly falling out of the play-in spot is certainly a decision

  8. Oh ok then. So just play Steph 28 min then or even better don’t play him at all, because apparently it doesn’t make a difference

  9. Remote-Picture-8341

    What about 34 or 36 minutes Steve?

    That’s half a quarter? That wouldn’t affect a game?

  10. LukaDoncicfuturegoat

    Bro is gonna make r/warriors commit a hate crime

  11. Crazyhawk28

    Well you guys lost by 4, so it probably didn’t help

  12. Biglundtry

    3 mins of Steph curry can create like 10 points lol

  13. KingCakeBabyOKC

    Lmfaoooo this is objectively hilarious. How does he do this? Most coaches tend to over rely on their stars.

  14. bobbdac7894

    4-6 extra minutes is actually big in an nba game and could be a major difference.

  15. purplebuffalo55

    2 minutes can be a 15-0 run in the NBA, so yea that makes a huge difference

  16. HoyaDestroya33

    You would think someone fighting for Playoffs would play his players more minutes but Kerr disagrees. I understand if it was a blowout but come on, it was very winnable.

  17. Baby_Yod4

    Steph Curry is the only superstar where his minutes have to be very precise. He’s taken out of the game the same time no matter what. I don’t get why Steve Kerr can’t just leave him in for 40+ minutes

  18. DirkNorizzki

    Does Kerr not know that the team struggles during the non-Curry minutes?

  19. SemataryPolka

    I noticed Steph not playing a huge chunk in the early 4th and I was quite pleased

  20. antoniomanuel10

    In a game of runs, when the Warriors couldn’t score to save their lifes, it totally was the right move to play Steph 29 minutes but Klay 33, and also give Klay the last shot to tie the game, it totally wasn’t Kerr fault, the other team had their stars play 37/38, minutes, almost a full quarter of basketball extra, and the Warriors were -11 with Steph on the bench, but god forbid Kerr from taking any responsibility for being a dumb rock

  21. actual_yellow_bag

    Steve already has his Cancun reservation in, can’t get a refund on that deposit guys.

  22. Kerr is just upset and being defensive. Of course 2 minutes of Steph matters in a close game everyone knows it

  23. matthitsthetrails

    Uhh, it’s Steph… the guy who made any lead unsafe in modern basketball..

Write A Comment