Mastodon
@New York Knicks

Knicks’ Playoff Prospects: Better Without Julius Randle?



Knicks’ Playoff Prospects: Better Without Julius Randle?

Subscribe for the latest New York sports news & videos!!

📡 LISTEN LIVE ➡️ https://go.audacy.com/eYtjvOIRpjb

Download the Audacy App today and stream your WFAN wherever you are!

FOLLOW US:
TWITTER – https://twitter.com/WFAN660
INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/wfansportsradio/
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/wfan660/

21 Comments

  1. Julius was very decisive this season and playing his best ball before the injury this a bullshit ass take… The knicks are not a better team without him

  2. Quickly played poorly in the Heat series?
    🤦‍♂️
    Way to tell me you know nothing about the Knicks.
    He didn’t play that series

  3. Ridiculous to assume that Knicks ceiling is higher without Randle. Knicks need another all-star presence. Can't rely on Brunson, brains, and grit if we're trying to win it all.

  4. I think I agree with Sal on this… 🤢🤢🤢 that tasted disgusting coming out of my mouth & I hope I'm wrong 😂

  5. The question should have been:

    What do the Knicks have to overcome in order to go on a deep playoff run?

    1. No Randle. No one on this team can get fouled at the clip JuJu does ( about 10 a game).

    2. Lack of size.

    3. Lack of inside presence. See Randle.

    The Knicks can overcome these issues yet to advance deep into the playoffs will require them to battle.

  6. Knicks are better with Randle. That said – Knicks without Randle are still the 3rd best team in the league behind Boston and Denver.

  7. Are the Knicks better without Julius randle are you serious right now. Precious or Julius. That's the question because that is who is going to lose their minutes when he comes back. Josh Hart will be moved to the second unit which will help the second unit increase production. It's not even a question.

  8. In the playoffs, Randle has been a liability on defense. It actually was a 4 on 5 game most often

  9. What Randle give us in offense he gives it back on defense, he argues too much and seems to not care about defending at all..

  10. The Knicks are NOT a better team without Julius Randle. Even if the win a championship without him. All that represents is how damn good they will be when their entire team is healthy. Just the thought alone is dumb. If the Knicks are this good without him that represents how good they will be when their team is fully healthy.

    Media thinks it has to be toxic to get viewership. That alone is pathetic.
    No you don’t trade Julius Randle because if the Knicks are a championship caliber team without Randle having Randle makes them a dynasty.

    Y’all are small minded and toxic and you don’t have to be fans flock to positive energy too.

  11. I think on the season, the Knicks were +151 with Randle, Brunson, and OG on the floor. Insane to think that they're a better team without an All-NBA caliber player. Gotta be clickbait

  12. Regular Season Randle vs Playoffs Randle is two different players. Regular season he’s a beast and was learning to pass out of double teams more consistently. Playoffs? He’s either choked or was hurt and underperformed. The Math here reveals regular season is Randle’s ceiling of performance. Knicks therefore, are better without him and they’ve proven it because of where they are in the seeding in the East, Randle out of the rotation.

  13. Randle is nyk David Lee on GSW. Lee was a big part of GSW but once he got hurt GSW was able to showcase the splash brothers

Write A Comment