Mastodon
@Portland Trail Blazers

What would you think about this potential trade?



Orlando just lost a playoff game where their guards other than Suggs went a combined 0-19 with 3 assists. So I’d think Simons with Suggs and Banchero is a pretty legit option. Isaac is being underused there and is kinda redundant with Banchero.

Portland doesn’t have a top-20 PF like Isaac currently. He shoots the three well and is a good defender and rebounder. He’s a good deal due to having had a lot of injury downtime: 2+ years for an ACL and then most of the 22-23 season with a torn adductor muscle. Yet he played well this season and only has one year left on his deal. If Portland doesn’t want him, they could try to work him into a three-way deal for additional picks, etc.

by gistya

13 Comments

  1. crab90000

    This, along with the proposed Det deal sending Grant there and a trade up in the draft are a very interesting combo.

    The issue that concerns me is shooting. I know we want to be rag for Flagg, but lacking real shooting threats hurts the development of guys like Shae and Scoot who are expected to create.

    I’m very pro this trade, but would like something else to offset losing shooting and as injury insurance

  2. FullAutoLuxPosadism

    I do not want the bird boned maga chud

  3. choonghuh

    Can we take back worse players and more picks instead

  4. If there’s no way to get Franz, I’d prefer something around Black. Isaac is interesting, but still can’t look past the injury concerns.

  5. lets_BOXHOT

    Love his game but he has massive injury concerns. I also don’t think he’d enjoy living in Portland too much with his political opinions, so not clear he’d want to resign once his contract expires

  6. W00D-SMASH

    hard pass. we want a roster that is healthy and historically speaking that isnt jonathan isaac.

  7. Yes. Isaac is goated on defense and goated off the court.

  8. Mister_Mangina

    I’m not interested in a player who has missed nearly 3 times as many games as he has played over a 5 season span. Also a guy who caps at 20 mpg and is constantly injured can’t possibly be considered top 20 at his position.

  9. ReflectionGloomy8851

    Nah this is dumb. For one id rather have RW3 over Isaac and there’s like 5 other reasons why this is bad

  10. NotACuck420

    Would need more insurance than just a non-lottery pick for Simons if Isaac doesn’t re-sign. Not much, another protected 1st.

    After 1 season, this could be Simons for a mid-20s pick… and Simons could have a huge year for Orlando next year if things work out, it’d be a double gut punch.

  11. Bottrop-Per

    We’re essentially gambling on Isaac’s health and ability to play starter minutes in the long run; otherwise, this trade is a clear loss. Personally, I don’t think we need to make a gamble like that, we still have enough time to find a better trade.

Write A Comment