Mastodon
@Oklahoma City Thunder

For those who keep regurgitating the DL2 over Cas nonsense



For those who keep regurgitating the DL2 over Cas nonsense

by SneakyProcessor

7 Comments

  1. WaltRumble

    It’s not a dig on Wallace it’s a fit. We have 7 guards that see significant playing time. SGA, dub, Dort, Giddey, Joe, Wiggins, and Wallace. But only 2 forwards/centers.

  2. fredlikefreddy

    Yes great player now they don’t have to worry another any guards or wings. Beef it up

  3. Hookmsnbeiishh

    You are creating a false narrative in your head by cherry picking a minority argument.

    This post complained about giving up Lively:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Thunder/s/RtYvggvEwc

    It has negative score and the comments overwhelmingly support the Cason pick.

    This post asks before the draft if Lively would be a good fit:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Thunder/s/2WIOMtBy0k

    Comments are split but many agree that if the Thunder can get Wallace, that is the pick. Or they trade down and get Lively in the 18-24 range where the sub valued him at.

    There’s this post asking who to draft between Wallace, Dick, Lively:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Thunder/s/Hs5LJt42V4

    Take out the Dick jokes and Wallace is the favorite by far. Lively is a distant third option.

    Then the cherry on top; this post used a poll to see who the fans would rather draft between Wallace and Lively:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Thunder/s/sikygAl6iT

    86.4% of the votes went for Wallace.

    Turns out, this sub is collectively pretty damn smart. And anyone pushing the Lively > Wallace argument is someone to be ignored.

  4. ThunderAdams12

    There was never a Cason or Lively choice. The only choice was Cason and no Lively or no Cason and no Lively. Dallas doesn’t do the trade if they didn’t know Lively would be there at 12. The only way to get Lively would be to trade up to 9.

Write A Comment