Money. It’s a take that’ll get lots of engagement.
ThisRiverIsWild_
*******deep breath********
GrumpyRaincloud
Overall, no. Hell no. KG was a little more versatile but it didnāt add up overall to Duncanās level.
hispanoloco
Just gotta show those 5 rings
UnionParkBB
Better at what? He couldnāt have been talking about basketball or swimming.
CrissCrossAppleSos
When comparing high quality big men, I think Spurs fans will agree that we should value winning, and being able to play with other great players above simply putting up raw counting numbers on a bad team.
Beyond that, Duncan was a more efficient scorer, and again, as Spurs fans, we all know that efficiency is king when evaluating an offensive player
8 Comments
Money. It’s a take that’ll get lots of engagement.
*******deep breath********
Overall, no. Hell no. KG was a little more versatile but it didnāt add up overall to Duncanās level.
Just gotta show those 5 rings
Better at what? He couldnāt have been talking about basketball or swimming.
When comparing high quality big men, I think Spurs fans will agree that we should value winning, and being able to play with other great players above simply putting up raw counting numbers on a bad team.
Beyond that, Duncan was a more efficient scorer, and again, as Spurs fans, we all know that efficiency is king when evaluating an offensive player
Friendship cheese
Still salty about the Memorial Day Miracle