Mastodon
@Cleveland Cavaliers

Koby, call me I have a few ideas…



Caveat for bottom trade is removing Clarke and assuming JJJ’s extension is ~$40M. Obviously there would be some draft assets involved but who knows 🤷🏻‍♂️ thoughts?

by up_n_adamm

17 Comments

  1. Nets don’t do the first trade as they would be getting rid of way too much for DG. I don’t think the grizz do the second one.

  2. the_bear_ros

    Honestly lovely trades but id be surprised if Memphis gives up JJJ

  3. EnemySoil

    Everyone and their uncle’s trade ideas are the worst part about the off season lol

  4. nobraininmyoxygen

    If Mitchell is a fan of the first trade it would be easier if he just joined the Nets lmao.

    And Memphis isn’t trading JJJ.

  5. JunesDepartmentStore

    What is our infatuation with 3/4 team trades

  6. Getting 2 teams to agree on a trade is hard, getting 3 is harder, getting 4 teams to agree on a trade with that many players involved is nearly impossible.

  7. dasher089432

    There are a ton of 3 and d guys in the draft like Jamie Jasquez from last year. Do you Cavs fans understand that the best teams usually get their role players from the draft and not by trading for overpaid low efficiency volume shooters?

  8. Western_Physics_5231

    Ingram and Bridges would be 🔥🔥🔥

  9. BreakfastFeeling9981

    you want to help the grizzlies and the lakers

    no……..

  10. Formal_Beginning_280

    I really like that first trade but not sure if all the teams involved would agree to it. I’d like to trade for Bridges but not sure what we’d have to give up to get him

  11. Heavy_Sample6756

    Will you guys stop with the Brandon Ingram! And Memphis isn’t that dumb!

Write A Comment