So they acknowledge that the Knicks were missing starters but finish this, abomination of a thought, by saying every team they faced had perennial all-stars and even hall of famers. Meanwhile they never played Giannis, dame didn’t finish the series, Brunson was the only all star they played against before Boston.
It cannot be real people typing this stuff lol
Sonicclappedu
Lmao as a bucks fan I’m excited asf for a Knicks bucks series next playoffs. Definitely gonna be a good one. See you guys then.
MadSpaceYT
I’ve never seen a fanbase so confident in a team that needed 7 games to beat an opponent without 4 starters.
They seem to forget that the Sixers and Heat aren’t going anywhere. In fact if it wasn’t for Embiids injury that they would have been in the play in. They will run the same exact team because rn they are forced to max Siakim (lmao) while other teams have the flexibity to improve their rosters. I would be surprised if they finished in the top 6 again barring something crazy like another huge stars injury
SkaterWu
They had to close in seven with our bench’s bench. With OG playing, we would’ve most likely won. Throw Randle in the mix, and it’s not even fair. The dude was averaging 25/9/5, and as great as Josh Hart is, he’s not producing those numbers. Not to mention 6’4” vs 6’8”, and the more aggressive playstyle of Randle. Siakem would get absolutely punked in the post. It’s a completely different team that they played against. Same goes with the Bucks.
The_Notorious_Donut
I will never understand y’all giving a fuck about any of this
Coolio1014
I honestly can’t be mad while reading this, I just pity them.
It’s like seeing someone who’s obviously not in their right mind, who’s clearly on drugs, on the street screaming insults or believing they’re a unicorn or something as you walk by. I can’t be mad, rather I pity this person that they have come to this stage and society let it get so bad.
Pacers fans are so delusional about where they stand in the league that I feel bad for them. I think it’s their way to cope with the fact that they live in Indiana and that they have to support such a mediocre franchise. They have to grasp at straws and pretty much anything for hope, poor little things.
It will be funny when reality hits them next season though.
Dragonthorn1217
He’s not wrong. But yeah, ridiculous for him to think that it’s a given that they would have beaten us in a series w/ a healthy Randle or OG. What most people fail to realize is having Randle actually improves our overall defense a ton since guys don’t need to work so hard on offense. It’s such a luxury to just dump the ball to Randle down low and be confident he can score in a 1v1 iso situation. Brunson also wasn’t allowed to iso since other players could sag off others.
One thing about the Knicks that is reassuring is that consistency under Thibs. #4 seed his first year, missed the next, then #5 then #2 the following years. Also the team clearly has a solid identity and the defense can be counted on.
Sharp_Black
Yeah, sure, Precious Achiuwa would have *for sure* been better than Julius Randle….these takes are delusional smh.
9 Comments
Ok
So they acknowledge that the Knicks were missing starters but finish this, abomination of a thought, by saying every team they faced had perennial all-stars and even hall of famers. Meanwhile they never played Giannis, dame didn’t finish the series, Brunson was the only all star they played against before Boston.
It cannot be real people typing this stuff lol
Lmao as a bucks fan I’m excited asf for a Knicks bucks series next playoffs. Definitely gonna be a good one. See you guys then.
I’ve never seen a fanbase so confident in a team that needed 7 games to beat an opponent without 4 starters.
They seem to forget that the Sixers and Heat aren’t going anywhere. In fact if it wasn’t for Embiids injury that they would have been in the play in. They will run the same exact team because rn they are forced to max Siakim (lmao) while other teams have the flexibity to improve their rosters. I would be surprised if they finished in the top 6 again barring something crazy like another huge stars injury
They had to close in seven with our bench’s bench. With OG playing, we would’ve most likely won. Throw Randle in the mix, and it’s not even fair. The dude was averaging 25/9/5, and as great as Josh Hart is, he’s not producing those numbers. Not to mention 6’4” vs 6’8”, and the more aggressive playstyle of Randle. Siakem would get absolutely punked in the post. It’s a completely different team that they played against. Same goes with the Bucks.
I will never understand y’all giving a fuck about any of this
I honestly can’t be mad while reading this, I just pity them.
It’s like seeing someone who’s obviously not in their right mind, who’s clearly on drugs, on the street screaming insults or believing they’re a unicorn or something as you walk by. I can’t be mad, rather I pity this person that they have come to this stage and society let it get so bad.
Pacers fans are so delusional about where they stand in the league that I feel bad for them. I think it’s their way to cope with the fact that they live in Indiana and that they have to support such a mediocre franchise. They have to grasp at straws and pretty much anything for hope, poor little things.
It will be funny when reality hits them next season though.
He’s not wrong. But yeah, ridiculous for him to think that it’s a given that they would have beaten us in a series w/ a healthy Randle or OG. What most people fail to realize is having Randle actually improves our overall defense a ton since guys don’t need to work so hard on offense. It’s such a luxury to just dump the ball to Randle down low and be confident he can score in a 1v1 iso situation. Brunson also wasn’t allowed to iso since other players could sag off others.
One thing about the Knicks that is reassuring is that consistency under Thibs. #4 seed his first year, missed the next, then #5 then #2 the following years. Also the team clearly has a solid identity and the defense can be counted on.
Yeah, sure, Precious Achiuwa would have *for sure* been better than Julius Randle….these takes are delusional smh.