“Bulls asking price for Zach LaVine has dropped significantly; Chicago might be willing to perform a salary dump deal; both parties want a trade this off-season”
“Bulls asking price for Zach LaVine has dropped significantly; Chicago might be willing to perform a salary dump deal; both parties want a trade this off-season”
I’m concerned about his health. Seems too good to be true.
Would rather target DJM, Trae, etc.
brandoi
Matching Zach’s $43M requires at least 3 of our 4 tradeable salaries plus another vet min guy. This would be a huge mistake.
nottherealstanlee
At this point I want two 1sts just to take him lol
AntSmith777
Bulls are so dumb lol. They should have just done this last year.
Jumpy_Novel456
Too lazy to google his contract but what are the chances he just gets bought out?
Patton370
Would a sign and trade with DLO work?
I think there are better options, but it’s not the worst option
Scorpionrah
Uhh no uhhh hell no with two middle fingers up
DeAndreWilliams1
Trade LeBron for LaVine and we’ll be contenders
NigelGoldsworthy
We don’t have a way to match salaries without giving up way too much.
iamdare
A team like Detroit would make sense. But to be honest the best thing for contenders who want him is to wait if he gets bought out.
Marktaco04
Hell no, we neee desperately need to put all the respurces into a quality back up big
Dantheman12310
I wouldn’t want to take a chance giving up 2-4 players for 1 that has semi frequent injuries & has to learn to step up more on the defensive end
His offense is great, but he probably won’t be as dynamic of a slasher at this point & shooting needs to be proven on this team rather than how they shoot for others (thanks to that Lakers shooting tax)
jasonluong
Bulls have to attach FRPs to dump LaVine now. That contract is. It worth taking on at this point. He has to play really well to start the season to change that.
FrstOfHsName
If its DLo and Rui I’m in.
nice_kitchen
Rui Vando Vincent JHS gets you there, salarywise. Issue is, even if it costs zero FRPs, you’ve used up almost all of your vehicles that you could attach FRPs to anyway in other trades.
doyourjobpelinka
its a Bradley Beal situation…any upside or talent upgrade is negated by taking on the worst contract in the league…
songs_dongs
why don’t we ever have a discussion on the best and realistic role pieces we can acquire via trade/free agency?
Bahamut727
Nah I want two firsts for taking on his contract. These other teams wanted that to take Russ time to make them eat their words
Def ain’t giving up Rui Reaves vando etc for him
Jagasi
Hard pass. We need a true center to take the stress off AD. Two bigs threatening the post will open up more opportunities for perimeter shots. Right now, teams just flood AD and then rush at any outlet pass.
Michvito
just waive him at this point /s
Musa_2050
We need 2 way players
SameEnergy
*expect if the lakers want him.
behappysometimes
I like players that play, no thank you.
coachlife
Please noooooooooooooo! Terrible salary and he is unreliable in the playoffs.
Equivalent_Slice7138
I want Zach but he is WAAAYYYYYYY too expensive for his injury history
gl129384
That’s a toxic contract for any team wanting to trade for him
27 Comments
Still hard to match no?
I’m concerned about his health. Seems too good to be true.
Would rather target DJM, Trae, etc.
Matching Zach’s $43M requires at least 3 of our 4 tradeable salaries plus another vet min guy. This would be a huge mistake.
At this point I want two 1sts just to take him lol
Bulls are so dumb lol. They should have just done this last year.
Too lazy to google his contract but what are the chances he just gets bought out?
Would a sign and trade with DLO work?
I think there are better options, but it’s not the worst option
Uhh no uhhh hell no with two middle fingers up
Trade LeBron for LaVine and we’ll be contenders
We don’t have a way to match salaries without giving up way too much.
A team like Detroit would make sense. But to be honest the best thing for contenders who want him is to wait if he gets bought out.
Hell no, we neee desperately need to put all the respurces into a quality back up big
I wouldn’t want to take a chance giving up 2-4 players for 1 that has semi frequent injuries & has to learn to step up more on the defensive end
His offense is great, but he probably won’t be as dynamic of a slasher at this point & shooting needs to be proven on this team rather than how they shoot for others (thanks to that Lakers shooting tax)
Bulls have to attach FRPs to dump LaVine now. That contract is. It worth taking on at this point. He has to play really well to start the season to change that.
If its DLo and Rui I’m in.
Rui Vando Vincent JHS gets you there, salarywise. Issue is, even if it costs zero FRPs, you’ve used up almost all of your vehicles that you could attach FRPs to anyway in other trades.
its a Bradley Beal situation…any upside or talent upgrade is negated by taking on the worst contract in the league…
why don’t we ever have a discussion on the best and realistic role pieces we can acquire via trade/free agency?
Nah I want two firsts for taking on his contract. These other teams wanted that to take Russ time to make them eat their words
Def ain’t giving up Rui Reaves vando etc for him
Hard pass. We need a true center to take the stress off AD. Two bigs threatening the post will open up more opportunities for perimeter shots. Right now, teams just flood AD and then rush at any outlet pass.
just waive him at this point /s
We need 2 way players
*expect if the lakers want him.
I like players that play, no thank you.
Please noooooooooooooo! Terrible salary and he is unreliable in the playoffs.
I want Zach but he is WAAAYYYYYYY too expensive for his injury history
That’s a toxic contract for any team wanting to trade for him