If Presti is seriously willing to do that, we should keep the pick and draft whoever he thinks he can get with it.
goodtimes1999
I’d rather stick at #2 and pick
DrummerRealistic2863
Hell no keep #2. We already got Poole we don’t need another reclamation project
Oldschoolhollywood
No 🙂
ImprobablePlanet
This is all hypothetical BS anyway, but if OKC was really at the door hat in hand trying to unload Giddey, Dawkins and Winger should say you’ve got an arsenal of draft capital, that’s going to cost more than a pick swap.
rueiraV
I would consider the trade if Sarr doesn’t fall to 2
MaleficentDraw1993
No.
Amazing-Army-4067
If I see Josh giddey’s name one more time…
Joshottas
These Giddey trade proposals gotta stop. Team has to fix Poole and his value, so I’m guessing he’s gonna be PG1 for the foreseeable future. Neither him or Giddey can play effectively off-ball, so why even float these ideas?
9 Comments
If Presti is seriously willing to do that, we should keep the pick and draft whoever he thinks he can get with it.
I’d rather stick at #2 and pick
Hell no keep #2. We already got Poole we don’t need another reclamation project
No 🙂
This is all hypothetical BS anyway, but if OKC was really at the door hat in hand trying to unload Giddey, Dawkins and Winger should say you’ve got an arsenal of draft capital, that’s going to cost more than a pick swap.
I would consider the trade if Sarr doesn’t fall to 2
No.
If I see Josh giddey’s name one more time…
These Giddey trade proposals gotta stop. Team has to fix Poole and his value, so I’m guessing he’s gonna be PG1 for the foreseeable future. Neither him or Giddey can play effectively off-ball, so why even float these ideas?