Mastodon
@San Antonio Spurs

Victor Wembanyama is Breaking the NBA’s Awards



Victor Wembanyama is Breaking the NBA’s Awards

Victor Wembanyama is currently favored to win the NBA’s Most Improved Player award for the 2024-25 NBA season, which would be weird, because Victor Wembanyama is heading into his second season in the NBA.

But believe it or not, a second-year player winning Most Improved Player has happened more often than you probably think, although it’s still highly unusual.

Additionally, with how good Wemby already was during his rookie season, it makes things even more difficult in terms of the kind of improvement he’d need to have in order to stand out in the race.

So with how the MIP award has typically been treated throughout the course of NBA history, should Victor Wembanyama really be the favorite?

➥ 𝙎𝙪𝙗𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙚: https://www.youtube.com/c/AlexHoops?sub_confirmation=1
➥ 𝙏𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧: https://twitter.com/AlexHoops_
➥ 𝘽𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙖 𝙋𝙖𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙣: https://patreon.com/AlexHoops

➥ 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙢𝙚
Providing NBA analysis by making film digestible and using analytics thoughtfully to contextualize on-court production. I cover the NBA in various capacities as a writer and digital content creator. If you love basketball and the NBA, be sure to subscribe to my channel.

DISCLAIMER: I do not claim ownership of any footage or clips used in this video. The use of these clips is protected under Fair Use Policy.

#NBA #VictorWembanyama

45 Comments

  1. I think the Most Improved Player is also skewed towards players whose usage gets a boost after getting traded or something else. Victor Oladipo winning the MIP for the 2017-18 season in Indiana comes to mind.

  2. Need to consider in the Olympics he averaged 16,10,3,2 in under 30mpg numbers just about as good as a motivated LeBron who won the Olympics MVP and it is definitely harder to put up big numbers in the Olympics. Would not be surprised to see him in the MVP race especially being the clear superstar of his team

  3. Rookies typically play better to end their first season so wemby as a second year player might be very similar to the end of his rookie season but that would still be a big jump from year to year. The award discourse is typically that of what you would think a breakout player of the year award and I kinda wish that’s what it would be changed too.

  4. Sophmore players should be ineligible for the award, they are literally meant to improve greatly from year one to year two.

  5. Most improved player isn’t for guys who were day 1 stars on star trajectory. Ja had an incredible leap in his third year—but it’s not really for him and it’s definitely not for something like LeBron in his second year. Imagine him winning that award, what those convos would’ve been. Your first three years you shouldn’t be eligible, because to me, MIP should only be for guys that either weren’t supposed to be much, or just didn’t show much and then broke past what they were believed to be. It’s for Coby Whites and Lauri Markannens not Ja Morants and Kevin Loves

  6. problem is the criteria is completely fucked up and inconsistent as hell… for example ja won it over dejounte going from 19 to 27 ppg but having his assists per game drop from 7,5 to 6 while murray was in dpoy contention and went from averaging 15-5 and 6 to 21-9and 7…. i'd be fine with that, if only luka would've won it the year prior by going from 21-7-6 to 29-9-8…. instead ingram won it over luka even tho his improvement was significntly worse than luka, going feom 18 to 23 ppg and had no stat improving more than luka…. i'm be fine with luka not winning It but how tf can the criteria change so much in one year…imo players that are in their first 3 years are EXPECTED to improve so should not be qualified for the awards

  7. The thing is that Victor does not care about this award, he'll just play the game and do his best.

  8. I doubt he really improves enough anyway. He’d probably have to be top 5 player next year to improve enough to justify winning it as a 2nd year player.

  9. Wemby has the chance to go from a rookie to an actual Top 10 player in the league. Just because its Wemby doesnt mean he shouldn't win this award. Unless a player makes a bigger jump he should definitely win it.

  10. As a Spurs fan, Wemby being in the MIP conversation is ridiculous. I mean, the only way he should be a candidate would be if he ends the season with a 27/14/5/3/4 stats line or something as outrageous as that.

    Well, let's hope he actually becomes a MIP candidate.

  11. Victor doesn't give a damn about this trophy! He's only going to think about the NBA title! We all agree that it's crazy and impossible with only 2 years with this Spurs team but in his head that's where he wants to go

  12. i think the fact he went from 0/0/0/0/0 to 21/10/4/1/4 and didn't win last year is crazy. nobody else came close to that

  13. Like the debate w/ Chet ROTY all year long … he’ll get them all like thanos give him that trophy + 1st DPOY as he was second last year lol it would be kind of an improvement so yeah let him get it on his sophomore year then move on after to multiple MVP’s and DPOY for the next decade

  14. Well if wemby avwrage 26+points 10+reb 5 +assist 1.5+ steal 2.5+ block amd get the spurs to the play off. Theres a big chance he win it

  15. The Most Improved Player award should to be relative to the natural improvement trajectory. Rather than the difference in stats like ppg, it seems worth considering the percentage increase.

  16. can we please stop considering second year players for the most improved player conversation i’m sorry but it just kills the whole value of it, it’s supposed to be unexpected

  17. he’s not winning mip, with his stat he’s going to have to win mvp fmvp first team all nba and mip is just bonus

  18. That Wemby is the favorite for MIP is a reflection of how poorly he shot, the plethora of turnovers, and the fact his team didn’t improve from year to year.

  19. Victor cant be MIP. He started big already. That's gonna be a huge jump for him to be considered MIP

  20. I agree wholeheartedly, he just isn't a player in the spirit of the award. He will likely get a lot better but… That's just not what this award is about.

  21. Thank you Alex. I have an issue here with underlining _expectations_: to me it is about improvement, not expectations. Oftentimes improvement is unexpected but sometimes it is expected. If Victor improves alots the fact that it was expected won't lessen the improvement. Actually it may arguably be considered an even greater achievement, as he would have improved under the pressure of expectations, which for most people is more difficult than without pressure. But thanks again.

  22. As a Spurs fan I completely agree that the award should go to players who weren't expected to play at a higher level than what they showcased. Now even with that said, I do think it's still possible for great players to receive the MIP award but for them they're statistical production should have a crazy jump because they're expected to be great by default so they're "improvement" should have to be off the charts for them to be considered MIP

Write A Comment