Mastodon
@Atlanta Hawks

New Trade Proposal Sends Larry Nance to Cleveland, Hawks Make Improvements on Defense



Yet another Hawks trade proposal that fails to address the Hawks full roster situation. How can the Hawks trade one body for two when they have no empty slots? Do all SI writers fall into the fan fiction bucket? I have seen several SI writers fail to address this matter.

by rockhoward

5 Comments

  1. MiserableSoft2344

    I’m not gonna lie bro, I wouldn’t mind giving a chance to Dean Wade if we’re not gonna hang on to Larry Nance for long. It’s not great volume but Dean’s got good percentages from 3.

  2. WheneverYh

    Isn’t Wade injury prone and also important to Cavs? I don’t think they would want 1/1 swap for Nance

    EDIT: this article lol. They argue Nance should be traded cause Capela, OO & Jalen. Few sentences later they say Wade would be useful esp behind Jalen.

    Like Nance is not needed behind JJ but Wade is? Ok

  3. Sammcbucketts

    Why the hell would the hawks give up a 2nd round pick in this deal. I would do it if the 2nd round pick was coming to us

  4. Jon_Koncak

    Remember when SI wasnt a clickbait trash publication?

  5. PeasePorridge9dOld

    Meh, not the best deal I’ve seen but I’d do it. Wade gives us insurance if we can deal Hunter. Not sure if I care whether we cut Jerome or Matthews and the 2nd is basically equivalent to nothing as it’ll probably be closer to 60 than to 45.

    Would prefer to hold Nance and deal Capela but it doesn’t look like the FO agrees with me.

Write A Comment