At first, I thought it was fair assuming my own bias. Then I looked at the list. There are players I would say are closer to them ranked so much higher. After looking closer, I would say at least high 30s / lower 40s for Randle and Brunson.
Mitch and RJ, I’m not mad at. Maybe slightly higher. RJ missing time and the awful start sets him back. Mitch is a trickier player to rank as his individual ability doesn’t reflect his importance to the team.
beanie_mac
Here are the ones I have issue with: – Zion in the top 10 is crazy to me…but maybe that’s just me. – Jerami Grant 11 and 13 spots, respectively, over Brunson and Randle is nuts. – Sabonis ranked 18 spots ahead of Randle is wild. – Aaron Gordon is not better than Randle. – Klay Thompson isn’t better than Brunson and Randle…and neither is Bane for that matter.
But the thing that kinda pisses me off the most is his negative blurb on Julius. Idk, it rubs me the wrong way that he can write something positive about EVERYONE in the top 50…but has to take shots at Randle.
“Aspiring creator who has yet to come to terms with how his strengths best serve a winning team.”
Like really? You’re not gonna mention how he’s top 10 in total points and rebounds? Not gonna mention how he’s one of the few players avg. 24/10/3? Not gonna mention how he’s completely adjusted his shot diet and play style this year?
TomGNYC
basically knick trolling for clicks. just ignore them.
and1spree
I’m glad they fixed Randle. Putting him at 90 in the first ranking was wild. It’s also great to see Mitch get on the list.
omarade2
The ringer is owned by bill Simmons, the guy who was on tv 1 nba draft for ESPN and got fired immediately because he wouldn’t stop talking about the Celtics the entire time. The ringer occasionally has a good article here and there but their nba coverage is some of the worst garbage ever written. They make bleacher report look like a Pulitzer Prize winner.
chumboschrute
The whole list is garbage. Alex Caruso is not too 100 and ranked above rj!? Slap in the face Vucevic being ranked 98 is complete disrespect. Ad Zion pg and kawhi are all ranked too high. Randle is at minimum top 25
P30A
Embarrassing
Jimmit79
Are they serious with this list so many garbage role players over Randle and JB.
lonelysadknicksfan
Hawks have 2 top 50 players and 5 top 100 players but are 2 games under .500 make it make sense
leaC30
We have guys in the bottom 50 of the top 100 🙌🏾😅
solo118
Let’s check back in next month and see if we get Jules/Brunson in the top 50!
Chr1s78987x
Randle should be top 30 and Brunson top 40. RJ and Mitch are fairly ranked
QueAsc0
Fantasy top 100s are better than this garbage. I’ve lost a lot of respect from The stingers NBA ‘analysis’ recently
13 Comments
At first, I thought it was fair assuming my own bias. Then I looked at the list. There are players I would say are closer to them ranked so much higher. After looking closer, I would say at least high 30s / lower 40s for Randle and Brunson.
Mitch and RJ, I’m not mad at. Maybe slightly higher. RJ missing time and the awful start sets him back. Mitch is a trickier player to rank as his individual ability doesn’t reflect his importance to the team.
Here are the ones I have issue with:
– Zion in the top 10 is crazy to me…but maybe that’s just me.
– Jerami Grant 11 and 13 spots, respectively, over Brunson and Randle is nuts.
– Sabonis ranked 18 spots ahead of Randle is wild.
– Aaron Gordon is not better than Randle.
– Klay Thompson isn’t better than Brunson and Randle…and neither is Bane for that matter.
But the thing that kinda pisses me off the most is his negative blurb on Julius. Idk, it rubs me the wrong way that he can write something positive about EVERYONE in the top 50…but has to take shots at Randle.
“Aspiring creator who has yet to come to terms with how his strengths best serve a winning team.”
Like really? You’re not gonna mention how he’s top 10 in total points and rebounds? Not gonna mention how he’s one of the few players avg. 24/10/3? Not gonna mention how he’s completely adjusted his shot diet and play style this year?
basically knick trolling for clicks. just ignore them.
I’m glad they fixed Randle. Putting him at 90 in the first ranking was wild. It’s also great to see Mitch get on the list.
The ringer is owned by bill Simmons, the guy who was on tv 1 nba draft for ESPN and got fired immediately because he wouldn’t stop talking about the Celtics the entire time. The ringer occasionally has a good article here and there but their nba coverage is some of the worst garbage ever written. They make bleacher report look like a Pulitzer Prize winner.
The whole list is garbage. Alex Caruso is not too 100 and ranked above rj!? Slap in the face Vucevic being ranked 98 is complete disrespect. Ad Zion pg and kawhi are all ranked too high. Randle is at minimum top 25
Embarrassing
Are they serious with this list so many garbage role players over Randle and JB.
Hawks have 2 top 50 players and 5 top 100 players but are 2 games under .500 make it make sense
We have guys in the bottom 50 of the top 100 🙌🏾😅
Let’s check back in next month and see if we get Jules/Brunson in the top 50!
Randle should be top 30 and Brunson top 40. RJ and Mitch are fairly ranked
Fantasy top 100s are better than this garbage. I’ve lost a lot of respect from The stingers NBA ‘analysis’ recently