Mastodon
@Washington Wizards

Trade Ideas (Heat, Knicks, 76ers)



Basis of Trade is to collect picks, while either getting young guys on our team or get money off the books by 2025.

These ideas are rough (see: pick protections), with Knicks being the least likely outcome; and 76ers trade likely needing additional guys/assets from both teams.

What are your thoughts on these concepts?

by Dominyxx

8 Comments

  1. BodaciousSalacious

    You’ll prob get roasted in the comments, but these are the types of realistic trades we should be expecting as fans.

  2. FlapsackMcBingus

    That 76ers trade is lunacy. They don’t even know if they can retain Harden. Even then, once they trade Tobias, think about the forwards they still have on their roster, and now you’re also including Maxey?

    Danuel House, 38 year old PJ Tucker, Niang would be their forward rotation.

  3. Turbo2x

    No reason for the Knicks to trade Hart. He’s a perfect fit for that team. He’ll opt out of the player option and sign a new deal.

  4. Dominyxx

    Ideally I’d want to get our 1st back from the Knicks, but to do that we’d have to work with players that aren’t RJ Jalen or Randle.

  5. tim2b21

    I’m down for any trade where we don’t give our pick

  6. spawn3887

    Of the three, I think I like the Knicks the best. Probably best chance to get an additional high pick.

    Heat trade – makes a lot of sense, except the 2027 pick swap bothers me. They might get ahead on that one still. I’d try and do it without. Or maybe we just have rights to pick swap?

    Knicks – Again I don’t like having to include a later pick, but c’est la vie. The two 2024 picks would be nice.

    76ers – not bad tbh. We get out of everything, can ship Harris out at the deadline, and get picks.

  7. 18YearOldSamBennett

    I like your trades, just don’t like that we’re including firsts. I’m 100% opposed to any type of trade that involves us being the ones to trade a first no matter how protected it is. I don’t want us being in a position where we’re unable to trade those picks (26-30) later on because we threw them in for literally no reason to begin with.

    This is why we were in the position of being unable to trade our first rounders the last couple years and still are not able to. With Wall, I understood why we had to throw in the first, but not with Brad. Not when there’s multiple teams that are reportedly interested in him

Write A Comment