Mastodon
@Indiana Pacers

Indianapolis Colts – Anthony Richardson not among three problems to solve! Pacers free agent targets



Colts problems solved today – cornerback, offensive line, and tight end! And all three solutions are elegant and easily achieved!
Pacers have money they must spend – where should they spend it? What free agents should they avoid?

23 Comments

  1. Seriously???Richardson not a problem??? A guy with very little Skill at the most important position on the team?? Why are you bending over to not seem too critical of this guy???
    Why??

  2. Idk y they didn’t keep Gilmore to mentor these young guys, I know he wanted out but so what Ballards job is to to what’s best for the colts. I’ve always been a Ballard defender but I can’t defend that

  3. Im willing to bet smith goesnt go to guard. People been saying that since hes been in the NFL.

  4. I wish the colts would trade MAC and focus on Woods or another young player. I’m just tired of watching him play

  5. Im hopeful these young men can step up and be ball players. May be a bumpy road for a bit but lets see some heart out there. Go ball out and knock people down. Win loose or draw.

  6. Kent, why is Tony Richardson not a problem?. Don't use your subjective eye-test. It didn't work with Matty Frozen Feet. The Colts still have the same BAD offensive pass blocking line. And they still have the same bad receiving group. JT is washed up with his best days behind him.
    Has anyone seen Jeff Friday…what a great guy.

  7. Kent, i will save this episode and play it back after the bears game. Where is that confidence coming from after a 4-12-1 season?!? 🧐

  8. Why does it seem Pinter performed so well at center, but so poorly at RG? Are those positions so different?

  9. The Colts should stick with jelani woods at the number 1 TE spot. And start Richardson because they drafted him for a reason right?

  10. Sign Cam Johnson with a poison pill, front-loaded deal. We need a 3&D wing, and James Jones knows how to pick 'em.

  11. I agree….I have always liked Peters…..reminds me of Big Play Ray…I agree…..slide Smith to Right Guard…….as I told you…..put Freeland at Right Tackle…or I like the Emil at guard also….but like Smith at Right Guard better…..Freeland at Tackle….or even start Freeland at GUARD……………..Smith moved to tackle…….from guard….move Freeland (who is very athletic to GUARD)……wouldn’t that be DYNAMIC? ATHLETIC? WOODS and Gransen….are your tight ends….hello……Gransen is a Dallas CLARK doppelgänger….and WOODS is JUST A FREAK……..CLark 4.65 40 Gransen 4.63 Granson 6’2 240, Clark 6’3 250…………Gransen is the motion tight end….Woods is the inline blocker (to help freeland when necessary and red zone threat as well as a threat to stretch the seam……..but there you go…..not rocket science…we need to run EMPTY personnel ALOT this year, not only to make it easier for AR to process, but to spread the field………..create advantages. This will also take pressure off of the blocking………if there are 5 guys out in routes that means there needs to be 5 people covering whose backs are to RICHARDSON……….(distinct running advantage)….with a SIXTH man needed to SPY Richardson (if defenses are smart…….and that leaves only 5 men to be blocked….LOL….easy math…….well someone needs to try to defend the middle of the field (a little right) like maybe a line backer……leaving us with 5 O lineman to block FOUR defenders……..easy peasy………….I believe we will see empty personnel a lot this year……this will also help alleviate the work load on Taylor………

  12. I mean look at these comps……Dallas Clark last two years in college……38-539-4-14.2, 43-742-4-17.3 now compare to Granson……..35-536-5-15.3, 43-721-9-16.8…….these are almost identical……same height, weight, route ruining ability…..etc……..I think it is very clear who the tight ends are…………..

Write A Comment