Mastodon
@Los Angeles Clippers

Just because you can trade for James Harden doesn’t mean you should



Just because you can trade for James Harden doesn’t mean you should

by doinnothin

18 Comments

  1. jcw4455

    I’m open to hearing what the other options are.

  2. nepats523

    Yeah, not if it costs the only decent “young” player on the team

  3. green-lazuli-8426

    If Harden is there you take it

  4. The_Skyro

    Fuck it let’s go! Fool me four times or whatever

  5. simonffplayer

    if we do something like the beal trade, sure why not

    if we have to give up mann, hard pass

  6. Wheres all the FO is dumb fire Frank crowd go? Its time for yall to shine if this goes thru

  7. UrDadsFave

    It’ll only be for year. It could be worse.

  8. Haveyoureaditb4

    If we can get harden without giving up substantial assets it is worth it. But probably either Mann or bones will have to go.

  9. GlueGuy00

    The market for Norm/Mook is not there. There’s no guarantee they can sign Russ for MLE or lower. Besides, I rather have Harden be the initiator over PG13.

  10. Rawrlorz

    Do it man. He’s still a good player and can help the offense

Write A Comment