Mastodon
@Los Angeles Clippers

Let’s settle this. Which era did you like better?



Let’s settle this. Which era did you like better?

by Virtual_Perception18

22 Comments

  1. Steve-Ballmer

    I say kawhi, pg….

    The bitching with blake, cp3, and doc were horrendous

  2. Atomo500

    Lob city was a way better regular season product. Those playoff series were way more oppressive tho with the way we would inexplicably implode. When healthy, I’ve always felt confident watching 213. So I’m going with them. Plus wcf obviously

  3. Salty_Watermelon

    Lob City was more fun to watch over 82 games, but they never had the potential of this 213 squad to actually compete for a title.

    I’ll reserve final judgment until Kawhi and PG are no longer Clippers.

  4. Kontrolgaming

    lob city, at least they were able to play most of the playoffs. And, man those dunks kept us glued to our seats.

  5. Cordellium

    I’m bias, but I really enjoyed the entertainment value that the lob city era brought us. It might not have amounted to much success, but it was darn fun to watch.

  6. Sfr33123

    Lob city is what made me a clipper fan so I gotta go with that

  7. True_Assumption_5812

    Mook should be in the photo since Ty loves to play him 🤣

  8. ReasonableDoughnuts

    Lob City was consistently entertaining. They obviously had injuries, but the core guys played together a lot.

    I don’t think Leonard and George have even played half of their games together as Clippers.

  9. LAC4LIFE

    Both have gave me nothing but heartbreak and depression

  10. Chessinmind

    Even though Lob city was fun, I don’t think we were ever serious contenders. Chris Paul is a great player but he’s not at the same level of greatness as Kawhi.

  11. sempai-chan310

    Lob City reg season games were an event. You never knew if another Mozgov, Perkins, or Knight were going to happen. I didn’t want to leave my seat during a game.

Write A Comment