Zach Lavine- 38 (Down 11 spots from 27)
DeMar DeRozen- 39 (Down 11 spots from 28)
Nikola Vucevic- 75 (Down 18 spots from 57)
I get that the Bulls are hoping that continuity will be the answer, but this core is not that strong compared to other players in the league. What do you thing? ESPN lowballing these guys or are their rankings fair?
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/38549013/nbarank-2023-best-players-2023-24-100-51
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/38625043/nbarank-2023-player-rankings-2023-24-50-11
by Josh_5890
5 Comments
Its funny how Zach and DeMar are always ranked right next to each other in these top player rankings, it’s like the writers think about the Bulls and decide to quickly check Zach and DeMar off the list back to back
We’ll win 35 games and fire everyone after the season and then tank for 3 seasons before repeating the mediocrity process. This franchise is hopeless. Doubt I watch more than 10 games this season
Looks like the opponent will have the best player most nights.
Espn is considtently terrible at analysis. I wouldn’t put much stock into this at all. Like they dropped Vucevic 18 spots presumably due to him getting older, but also dropped Lavine despite him being healthier than last year and ending the season last year with great numbers? Make it make sense.
How many teams are in the league? Having three top 100 players is about average