Ridiculous comparison. Makes zero sense except that they are both fat
Mo6181
Charles was a much better rebounder, a much better defender, and he had a fairly reliable base line turnaround jumper. His three point shot was never consistent, but he was willing to take it. Charles overpowered taller defenders in the paint. Zion relies exclusively on quickness and athleticism at the rim. Being an undersized 4 is about the only thing they have in common.
3 Comments
So a ball of famer?
Got it
Ridiculous comparison. Makes zero sense except that they are both fat
Charles was a much better rebounder, a much better defender, and he had a fairly reliable base line turnaround jumper. His three point shot was never consistent, but he was willing to take it. Charles overpowered taller defenders in the paint. Zion relies exclusively on quickness and athleticism at the rim. Being an undersized 4 is about the only thing they have in common.