Some people overlook Rob like he’s a shot chucker who is all style and no substance but idk man that was far from reality when I watched him in college. I like him but only if we get a 3rd pick to address what we need to address.
gearboxnine
Like him but I doubt our Fo is gonna take him that high
Independent_Baker969
idk two of the biggest team are in the wcf final i cant see a 6.1 guys matter that much
TheseFkingWeebs
What if he becomes an All-Star
Turbo2x
For the Wizards either they want to stick with Poole long term (hopefully on a smaller contract once this one is up) which makes Dillingham completely redundant, or they recognize players like Poole do not contribute to winning as a franchise cornerstone, which means they won’t consider Dillingham at 2. Dillingham really is just a 3″ shorter version of Poole who is somehow *worse* at defense, so I don’t see the point in taking him.
Temporary-Mud-2994
He’s very efficient from 3 44% from 3 with 4.5 attempts has great playmaking skills and best thing about his game is his handles he’s a very similar player to Garland but was way better in College but a player like him who has no defense and undersized he most likely won’t be a good defender because of size. We do have players that are around his height that are good like Garland, Young, and Brunson and Maxey.
7 Comments
Some people overlook Rob like he’s a shot chucker who is all style and no substance but idk man that was far from reality when I watched him in college. I like him but only if we get a 3rd pick to address what we need to address.
Like him but I doubt our Fo is gonna take him that high
idk two of the biggest team are in the wcf final i cant see a 6.1 guys matter that much
What if he becomes an All-Star
For the Wizards either they want to stick with Poole long term (hopefully on a smaller contract once this one is up) which makes Dillingham completely redundant, or they recognize players like Poole do not contribute to winning as a franchise cornerstone, which means they won’t consider Dillingham at 2. Dillingham really is just a 3″ shorter version of Poole who is somehow *worse* at defense, so I don’t see the point in taking him.
He’s very efficient from 3 44% from 3 with 4.5 attempts has great playmaking skills and best thing about his game is his handles he’s a very similar player to Garland but was way better in College but a player like him who has no defense and undersized he most likely won’t be a good defender because of size. We do have players that are around his height that are good like Garland, Young, and Brunson and Maxey.
He’s nice too