Mastodon
@National Basketball Association

[The Ringer] Did the Knicks Just Get Fleeced on the Most Expensive Reunion Ever?



[The Ringer] Did the Knicks Just Get Fleeced on the Most Expensive Reunion Ever?

by Blood_Incantation

36 Comments

  1. LongTimesGoodTimes

    Was it an overpay? Yes

    Do I still like it? Yes

  2. CanadaBBallFan

    “New York paid a Kevin Durantā€“level asking price”

    What year is the author living in. Its 2024. More like a Rudy Gobert level asking price.

  3. Pyromania1983

    Whether the price was too much or not, Bridges fits in perfectly with the Knicks, especially if they are able to retain OG using his bird rights. And after their run last season, and if they have a healthier roster this year, the trade will have easily been worth it.

  4. “Fleece” is a strong word here

    I think they were in a position where they could afford to overpay for someone who fits extremely well into what they are doing.

    He may even be the piece that gets them over the top.

    I’m still taking a healthy Celtics over a healthy Knicks, but health isn’t a guarantee and luck always comes into play in the playoffs.

    If they the fumble the OG situation, then I’d think very differently. I highly highly doubt he’s gone though.

  5. Not-Josh-Hart

    – Did the Knicks overpay Brunson?
    – Did the Knicks give up on Can Reddish too soon?
    – Is OG going to make the Knicks better?

    The media has always been wrong about Leonā€™s moves.

  6. Benotheking

    When was the last time they drafted a player of Bridges caliber? I like it for the Knicks.

  7. twobridges94

    Canā€™t put a price on the power of friendship

  8. Life_Ad_9518

    Knicks ainā€™t been championship contenders since Iā€™ve been an NBA fan; last good thing I remember the Knicks doing is Allan Houston hitting that game winner over Miami and doing the cool fist pumpā€¦ Now theyā€™re legit title contenders if they re-sign OG; good for them man ..sometimes we overthink sports, itā€™s simple – if you ainā€™t won in forever put all your chips in for a few years ..stop complaining that the deal ainā€™t perfect; who cares, go win a ring

    And they still have picks.

  9. HairyMootWarrior

    It was an overpay but also a great move.

  10. CornCobb890

    ā€œIf Randle stays, how does he fit in after watching the Knicks go on a playoff run without him last season? Does he take more off the table than he puts on, especially if they re-sign Anunoby?ā€

    Thatā€™s one of the dumbest lines Iā€™ve seen in sports writing history and tells you everything you need to know about the author.

  11. SourBerry1425

    If they keep OG too I donā€™t think it matters that they overpaid. If he walks for nothing then I think itā€™s tragic for them cause I donā€™t think Mikal is THAT much better.

  12. An overpay was the only way to get it done. Bridges was a coveted piece around the league. We were competing with other teams willing to give up 3-4 picks. Add on the cross town rival tax and the fact we don’t give up any depth and him being the perfect chemistry piece it made sense.

  13. Hovi_Bryant

    We’re gonna act like we didn’t learn anything from the Rudy Gobert trade? Let’s see how things pan out. And it’ll be a while before they do, given the volume of draft picks.

  14. Itā€™s an interesting experiment.
    What will happen when you finally give an uninjurable player to Thibs?

  15. Bridges is a good player, with a good health record, at a prime age, on a good contract, and is a good fit with their roster.

    Usually when you’re making a trade like this, you’re lucky if you can check off two or maybe three boxes from that list.

    Durable, versatile players who fit well together on the court is a winning recipe, as Boston just showed.

  16. mattbrianjess

    The Knicks have 8ā€¦..

    Brunson
    Randle
    Bridges
    Hart
    Donte
    Mitch
    Duece
    OG(šŸ¤žšŸ¤žšŸ¤žšŸ¤ž)

    ā€¦.guys who can play in a playoff series. I am assuming Hartenstein is gone.

    All except for Randle are under 30.

    All except for Hart and Randle under 28.

    Expensive? Yes.

    But it feels worth it to put a core in place that can compete every year.

    This(probably) isnā€™t a deep dark hole of not being able to compete because they gave up all the assets for 2 guys and realized shit we suck.

    Oh and they have 2 picks tonight

  17. bautistar1

    its an overpay, but that was the only way for knicks and nets to do business together. I also love this trade for the knicks and the roster construction is how i’d build my team if i was a gm as well.

  18. bigbobo33

    Does the Ringer like bullshit clickbait titles?

  19. RunnerTexasRanger

    Championship windows are too short in the NBA. You have to gamble when the time is right or youā€™ll forever be on the fringes.

    It was an overpay, but as long as they keep OG and Hartenstein, theyā€™re a contender.

  20. PaxDinero

    People underrate Mikal’s biggest strength, which is that he has literally never missed a game in 6 years in the nba. Even going back to college.

  21. Hefty-Profession-567

    The contrast in reaction to this trade v the Gobert trade is wild

  22. Swift_42690

    This is such a clickbait article. Did the Knicks overpay? Absolutely, they had to because they are dealing with their crosstown rival that they havenā€™t made a trade with since before Michael Jordan was drafted.

    Letā€™s not forget the Knicks still have a shit ton of picks left including 2 FRP for tonightā€™s draft. They just need to make sure we resign OG and iHart and we can run it back with the same squad + bridges this year. You know, the same squad that was one win away from the ECF when half the roster was decimated by injuries.

  23. I_Set_3_Alarms

    Picks are for nerds. Theyā€™re almost always better in theory than the player that actually gets selected

  24. cricket9818

    Considering we heard the rockets offered 4 firsts for him and the nets turned that down, the Knicks didnā€™t really offer *that* much more

    When you also consider what they have left and where their roster is now, it was a perfectly fine move to make

  25. Chromotoast

    The landscape of the NBA has changed and people are still enamored by the antiquated strategy to trade for star players. Deliberate roster construction surrounding talent to float around/below the new apron rules is how competent teams are building rosters. Knicks fans are happy with this trade because we understand what this teams strengths and weaknesses are, and this improves our team in real material ways, picks and draft capital are just hypotheticals. You canā€™t just sit on draft picks forever and this is exactly the type of move that we have always asked for. And being able to keep deuce is just *chefs kiss*.

  26. Le4-6Mafia

    This is absolutely worth it. If they sign OG theyā€™re the favorite behind the Cs and are set up to contend for as long as Brunson is at this levelĀ 

    Edit: favorite in the East

  27. MV7EaglesFan

    Ringer is mostly Bill Simmons surrounded by a bunch of Philly fans. Makes sense why they coping over there.Ā 

  28. BradyReas

    After watching the sixers waste picks for a decade idk how Knicks fans wouldnā€™t be happy with this outcome, especially if they get OG

  29. snowdude11

    Put some respect on Bridges name. He is the PERFECT fit for the Knicks as an elite 3nD player. Anyone watch the health of the Knicks destroy their post season hopes? That’s partly why they went and got a guy who hasn’t missed a SINGLE game in his NBA career.

  30. People paying $4000 for a studio apartment in NYC and you talking about an overpay? Itā€™s NY. People here overpay for everything. lol.

  31. Clemenx00

    NBA fanbases are treating picks like MLB fans treat prospects lmao

    You pull the trigger for a present guy every time.

  32. papichino88

    This author’s baseline example, that this is a KD level return makes no sense considering Bridges was part of the KD return. So a true KD level return is 9 picks + Cam Johnson.

Write A Comment