Mastodon
@Miami Heat

For those asking about Trae Young, what incentive would Hawks have to trade best player (to a team like Miami with only one tradable first rounder) when Spurs own Atlanta’s unprotected 1st rounders in 2025 and 2027 and can pick swap with them in 2026?



For those asking about Trae Young, what incentive would Hawks have to trade best player (to a team like Miami with only one tradable first rounder) when Spurs own Atlanta’s unprotected 1st rounders in 2025 and 2027 and can pick swap with them in 2026?

by rice-guardian

17 Comments

  1. MargielaMan568

    One tradable first rounder is horrendous asset management by our FO

  2. XanderAndretti

    If we have no assets and aren’t getting a big star, how about we stop getting pissed at every star we won’t get? Oh wait that would be the exact opposite of what the majority of this sub loves doing. The bed is made, quit bitching about it like it’s gonna change anything and hope for the best with the roster we put out there next season. Ffs, I feel like some of yall literally wake up and think how can i be miserable about my favorite basketball team today?

  3. OhMyItzBam_Herro305

    This the dumbest person, yet we continue to post bs from him lol.

  4. KindParamedic6657

    Geez we have so much money tied to mid players 🙁

  5. TheRatchetTrombone

    This sub: fuck Pat, he should’ve manipulated the Spurs into getting flecced by the Hawks so that the Hawks could be hypnotized into giving us Trae cause they blowing it all up what a negative -500 IQ GM we have.

    Even if I agreed with Trae, this was the reason that prevents it. But yall will still bitch and fucking moan regardless unless Herro was shipped to Russia for a bag of chips.

  6. SudTheThug

    we have one tradeable first round and people gonna lie and say the terry rozier trade wasn’t short sighted

  7. No-Process-2911

    While I agree that Atlanta doesn’t have a major incentive to tank without their own picks, there also isn’t really an incentive to stay mediocre for the sake of it. They clearly are building around Johnson and Risacher. Their future core is on a long term timeline and Atlanta isn’t getting their own picks back in the short term regardless. So if a team (likely not Miami due to their own lack of assets) offers a nice mix of younger pieces and picks to restock and build around their two young pieces, there likely is a conversation to be had there.

  8. HairyMootWarrior

    With today’s cba. Having only 1 available frp available is just malpractice. Do people still tell others that we have short memories for bagging out Riley these days? Cause this dude isn’t very good at his job anymore

  9. Affectionate_Grade80

    🗣️Run it back said more than once by a wise man. JJJ takes the sophomore leap along with Jovic. Where we meet the Celtics in the ecf but this time around we’re going to be fully healthy lmao

    And Caleb doesn’t sign that’s fine call the factory up and ship Keshad Johnson lets see how he plays in summer league.

  10. If we had multiple picks everyone would be saying the quality of the pick suck ‘just cos it’s Miami’

  11. julstar23

    Said as much and was downvoted because that’s not what people wanted to hear but it’s the truth .They have very limited assets so they can’t do much .

  12. ReviewGuilty5760

    How do we only have 1 tradeable pick? We have 2029 and 2031 picks

  13. Logical-Rest-7668

    Spurs definitely have more assets in term of picks. It comes down to what players are the Heat willing to give up. Personally the idea that Trae would go to a division rival would make the Hawks front office look bad.

Write A Comment