Mastodon
@National Basketball Association

[Esfandiari] Haynes just reported bulls proposed Wiggins and Paul for Lavine and gsw said no and waived CP3 lmao.



Haynes just reported bulls proposed Wiggins and Paul for Lavine and gsw said no and waived CP3 lmao.

source: https://x.com/samesfandiari/status/1807535064290644069

Bulls tried to get rid of Lavine without offering any picks. Warriors refused and just ended up waiving Chris Paul. Seems like Lavine's value is very low around the league. Warriors not with it.

by mMounirM

25 Comments

  1. icemankiller8

    I thought this was a troll account ā€¦ā€¦

  2. legend023

    Zach Lavine injury has to be worse than I thought

    Thatā€™s nothing.

  3. wearables24

    Honestly if bulls attached a pick I wouldā€™ve taken the chance on that

  4. InternetImportant911

    No one wants him for that contract and even worse that 15% trade kicker, still bad even he waives that trade kicker

  5. Extremeaty

    Bulls fans were saying Marks was just trying to drive Lavineā€™s value down lmao.

    Dude is genuinely a negative asset. He opted for surgery to avoid a trade to Detroit, thereā€™s zero chance the Bulls let him start the season on their roster and the league knows it.

  6. Bulls are better off hoping that Lavine can build up his value and try moving him at the deadline.

  7. Next-Firefighter-753

    That contract was so god damn stupidĀ 

  8. PeanutButterRice

    wiggins defense alone is more valuable than lavine

  9. RelevantTreacle3004

    Lol Zach Lavine is in such a bad spot

  10. ScootUnmanley

    Thereā€™s only like 2 or 3 truly terrible, untradeable, canā€™t give him away contracts in the league and of course we just have to have one of them

  11. I get it. Not like adding Levine makes us a contender and he’s a cap anchor moving forwards. Might as well clear the books for the post-Steph era.

  12. Cynadoclone

    Who the fuck believes anything Haynes has to say? The guy is a hack-joke.

  13. ColtCallahan

    Teams saw an overpaid empty calorie player with injuries get traded to the Suns last year and learned their lesson.

    Under this new CBA thereā€™s absolutely no way I want any part of Lavine and that contract.

  14. stomach-bug

    Lmao, LaVine had one down season. He ain’t Ben Simmons

  15. Conflict_NZ

    With the repeater tax Lavine would cost the Warriors around 150 million a year, no kidding they refused.

  16. Nobody wants a player that isn’t a bonafide superstar or elite 2nd option making 40M

  17. GloryEnthusiast

    nah the CBA going to have amend the trade and second apron clause, this is what happens when you have Grant Williams and CJ McCollum as your negotiators.

  18. IMovedYourCheese

    “Give us your $30M bad contract (that you can just waive) and take our $215M bad contract”

Write A Comment