The Knicks would make this trade to compensate for losing DiVincenzo, and they are already considering trading Robinson.
The Clippers would take Ingram because they need another on-ball creator in Leonard’s absence.
The Pelicans would agree to this trade because Ingram’s value is at an all-time low, and they really need a starting-caliber center. They would also have a clean rotation with Dejounte Murray, Herbert Jones, Trey Murphy III, Zion Williamson, Mitchell Robinson, and C.J. McCollum as the 6th man.
tallywoww
Knicks lose basically 2 bigs for 1 average one back. A healthy Robinson is also reasonable comparable to what they’re getting back anyway. They’d say no. Also PJ tucker isn’t worth Ingram
Joebobst
Pels are desperate but not pj tucker desperate. Knicks had more wings than they should that’s why they were ok to let donte go. They wanted bigs. Not to throw them away. Clips love norm. Noone loves Ingram. This is a classic case of lose-lose-lose
3 Comments
The Knicks would make this trade to compensate for losing DiVincenzo, and they are already considering trading Robinson.
The Clippers would take Ingram because they need another on-ball creator in Leonard’s absence.
The Pelicans would agree to this trade because Ingram’s value is at an all-time low, and they really need a starting-caliber center. They would also have a clean rotation with Dejounte Murray, Herbert Jones, Trey Murphy III, Zion Williamson, Mitchell Robinson, and C.J. McCollum as the 6th man.
Knicks lose basically 2 bigs for 1 average one back. A healthy Robinson is also reasonable comparable to what they’re getting back anyway. They’d say no.
Also PJ tucker isn’t worth Ingram
Pels are desperate but not pj tucker desperate.
Knicks had more wings than they should that’s why they were ok to let donte go. They wanted bigs. Not to throw them away.
Clips love norm. Noone loves Ingram.
This is a classic case of lose-lose-lose